CPU
GPU
Radeon R5 330
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8670D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 330 is positioned at rank 435 and the Radeon HD 8670D is on rank 146, so the Radeon HD 8670D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 330
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8670D.
| Insight | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8670D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $45), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 196.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+196.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 330 and Radeon HD 8670D
Radeon R5 330
The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.
Radeon HD 8670D
The Radeon HD 8670D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 330 scores 523 and the Radeon HD 8670D reaches 517 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 330 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 8670D uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 330) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670D). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670D).
| Feature | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 523+1% | 517 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+226% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 320 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 330 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 330 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 330) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8670D) — the Radeon HD 8670D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 330) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 8670D). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1)+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 3.2.
| Feature | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 330 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8670D's 200W — a 120% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 330) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-75% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 10.5+304% | 2.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 330 launched at $81 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Radeon HD 8670D launched at $60 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 8670D costs 66.7% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.6 (Radeon R5 330) vs 34.5 (Radeon HD 8670D) — the Radeon HD 8670D offers 197.4% better value. The Radeon R5 330 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R5 330 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $81 | $60-26% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $15-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.6 | 34.5+197% |
| Codename | Weston | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 18 2017 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #873 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 330 and Radeon HD 8670D
