G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 330 vs Radeon R7 M260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 330 vs Radeon R7 M260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($81 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M260

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 330 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
35.8% HIGHER MSRP
$110 MSRPvs$81 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $81 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 330 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M260 instead at 527 vs 523, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 330 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 330 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $81 vs $110, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.8% (6.5 vs 4.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R5 330 vs Radeon R7 M260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

Radeon R7 M260

The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 330 scores 523 and the Radeon R7 M260 reaches 527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 330 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 M260 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 330) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 715 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R5 330	Radeon R7 M260
G3D Mark Score	523	527
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS+43%	0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1024 MHz+43%	715 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 330	Radeon R7 M260
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 330 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 330) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon R7 M260 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 330	Radeon R7 M260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 330) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R7 M260). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R5 330	Radeon R7 M260
DirectX	12 (FL 11_1)	12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 330) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M260).

Feature	Radeon R5 330	Radeon R7 M260
Encoder	—	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 3.1	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 330 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M260's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 330) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R5 330	Radeon R7 M260
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	10.5+50%	7.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 330 came in at $81, while the Radeon R7 M260 launched at $110. On MSRP, Radeon R5 330 was 26.4% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.5 (Radeon R5 330) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon R5 330 offers 35.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 330 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R5 330	Radeon R7 M260
MSRP	$81-26%	$110
Performance per Dollar	6.5+35%	4.8
Codename	Weston	Opal
Release	April 18 2017	December 6 2015
Ranking	#873	#878

Search Radeon R5 330 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.