Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R5 330

AMD

Radeon HD 8670M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 330

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R5 330 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8670M

2013

Why buy it

  • 69.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $81 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 69.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 330 instead at 523 vs 520, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 8670M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 330 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 8670M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 8670M

The Radeon HD 8670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8670M scores 520 and the Radeon R5 330 reaches 523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8670M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8670MRadeon R5 330
G3D Mark Score
520
523
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.304 TFLOPS+193%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1024 MHz+14%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+233%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8670MRadeon R5 330
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8670M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 330 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 8670M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 330) — the Radeon HD 8670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8670MRadeon R5 330
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8670M draws 100W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 8670MRadeon R5 330
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
5.2
10.5+102%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 330 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8670MRadeon R5 330
MSRP
$81
Codename
Neptune
Weston
Release
May 14 2013
April 18 2017
Ranking
#507
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.