Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8670M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8670M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8670M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8670M

2013

Why buy it

✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 600 instead at 522 vs 520, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 8670M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8670M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon HD 8670M

The Radeon HD 8670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 600 scores 522 and the Radeon HD 8670M reaches 520 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8670M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 600) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670M). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 900 MHz.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8670M
G3D Mark Score	522	520
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS	2.304 TFLOPS+85%
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+80%	900 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	144 KB	320 KB+122%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8670M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 600 and System on the Radeon HD 8670M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro 600) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8670M) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8670M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 600 draws 40W versus the Radeon HD 8670M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8670M
TDP	40W-60%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	13.1+152%	5.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 600 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8670M
MSRP	$179	—
Codename	GP107	Neptune
Release	February 7 2017	May 14 2013
Ranking	#558	#507

Search Quadro 600 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8670M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.