GRID K180Q vs Quadro 600

GRID K180Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID K180Q vs Quadro 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K180Q vs Quadro 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K180Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 458.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • 462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 446.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID K180Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (534 vs 522), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K180Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $821 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 446.1% (2.9 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K180Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K180Q vs Quadro 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

NVIDIA

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K180Q scores 534 and the Quadro 600 reaches 522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K180Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro 600 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K180Q) vs 384 (Quadro 600). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600).

FeatureGRID K180QQuadro 600
G3D Mark Score
534+2%
522
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+84%
1.244 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
144 KB+13%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K180QQuadro 600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K180Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 600 carries 1 GB. Quadro 600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K180Q and 64-bit on the Quadro 600. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K180Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K180QQuadro 600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K180Q draws 225W versus the Quadro 600's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K180Q) vs 350W (Quadro 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID K180QQuadro 600
TDP
225W
40W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
2.4
13.1+446%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K180Q came in at $1000, while the Quadro 600 launched at $179. On MSRP, Quadro 600 was 82.1% cheaper ($821 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K180Q) vs 2.9 (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 offers 480% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 600 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K180QQuadro 600
MSRP
$1000
$179-82%
Performance per Dollar
0.5
2.9+480%
Codename
GK104
GP107
Release
June 28 2013
February 7 2017
Ranking
#595
#558

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.