GRID K180Q vs Quadro 600
GRID K180Q
Popular choices:
Quadro 600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K180Q is positioned at rank 381 and the Quadro 600 is on rank 249, so the Quadro 600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K180Q
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K180Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID K180Q | Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $1,000), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4787.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K180Q | Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4787.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K180Q and Quadro 600
GRID K180Q
The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Quadro 600
The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K180Q scores 534 and the Quadro 600 reaches 522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K180Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro 600 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K180Q) vs 384 (Quadro 600). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600).
| Feature | GRID K180Q | Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 534+2% | 522 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+84% | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 144 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K180Q | Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K180Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 600 has 1 GB. The Quadro 600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K180Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K180Q | Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K180Q draws 225W versus the Quadro 600's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K180Q) vs 350W (Quadro 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K180Q | Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 40W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 13.1+446% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K180Q launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the Quadro 600 launched at $179 and now averages $20. The Quadro 600 costs 98% less ($980 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (GRID K180Q) vs 26.1 (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 offers 5120% better value. The Quadro 600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K180Q | Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $179-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $20-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 26.1+5120% |
| Codename | GK104 | GP107 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #595 | #558 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K180Q and Quadro 600
