GeForce GT 435M vs GRID K180Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 435M

2013Core: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID K180Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 435M vs GRID K180Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 435M vs GRID K180Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 435M

2013

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

GRID K180Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 435M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (536 vs 534), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 435M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K180Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID K180Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 435M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 435M vs GRID K180Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 435M

The GeForce GT 435M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.

NVIDIA

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 435M scores 536 and the GRID K180Q reaches 534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 435M is built on Kepler while the GRID K180Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 435M) vs 1,536 (GRID K180Q). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 435M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q).

FeatureGeForce GT 435MGRID K180Q
G3D Mark Score
536
534
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+443%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 435M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K180Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 435MGRID K180Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 435M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K180Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 435M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 435M and 64-bit on the GRID K180Q. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 435M) vs 512 KB (GRID K180Q) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 435MGRID K180Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 435M draws 45W versus the GRID K180Q's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 435M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 435M) vs 350W (GRID K180Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 435MGRID K180Q
TDP
45W-80%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
11.9+396%
2.4