Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V7750 vs GeForce GT 435M

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V7750

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 435M

2013Core: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V7750 vs GeForce GT 435M Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V7750
1 GB 274
545
+1.7%
brand logoRadeon HD 2900 GT
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 565v
brand logoRadeon R5 M230
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi
brand logoRadeon HD 8990
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce GT 435M
2 GB 45
536
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 610M
brand logoGeForce 9800M GTS
brand logoGeForce 8800 GTS
brand logoGeForce 800M
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs GeForce GT 435M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V7750

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌508.9% higher power demand at 274W vs 45W.

GeForce GT 435M

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Draws 45W instead of 274W, a 229W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V7750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (545 vs 536), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V7750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V7750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs GeForce GT 435M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V7750

The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 435M

The GeForce GT 435M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V7750 scores 545 and the GeForce GT 435M reaches 536 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 435M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 384 (GeForce GT 435M). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 435M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7750GeForce GT 435M
G3D Mark Score
545+2%
536
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+726%
0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+1500%
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 435M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V7750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7750GeForce GT 435M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V7750 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 435M carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 435M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V7750 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 435M. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 435M) — the FirePro 3D V7750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7750GeForce GT 435M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 435M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7750GeForce GT 435M
DirectX
10.1
11.0+9%
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
3.3
4.0+21%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs No (GeForce GT 435M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 435M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7750GeForce GT 435M
Encoder
UVD 2
No
Decoder
UVD 2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V7750 draws 274W versus the GeForce GT 435M's 45W — a 143.6% difference. The GeForce GT 435M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 350W (GeForce GT 435M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 234mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7750GeForce GT 435M
TDP
274W
45W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
234mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.0
11.9+495%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro 3D V7750 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7750GeForce GT 435M
MSRP
$799
—
Codename
Tahiti
GK107
Release
January 18 2014
April 1 2013
Ranking
#423
#857
Search FirePro 3D V7750 on AmazonSearch GeForce GT 435M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.