FirePro 3D V7750 vs Radeon R5 M335

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs Radeon R5 M335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs Radeon R5 M335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V7750

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
432.7% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌265.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M335

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 436.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.7 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 274W, a 199W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M335 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (549 vs 545), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V7750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M335 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $649 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 436.6% (3.7 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M335 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V7750 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs Radeon R5 M335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V7750

The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

Radeon R5 M335

The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V7750 scores 545 and the Radeon R5 M335 reaches 549 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M335 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M335). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335).

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Radeon R5 M335
G3D Mark Score	545	549
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+540%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.482 TFLOPS+428%	0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	128+540%	20
L1 Cache	512 KB+540%	80 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Radeon R5 M335
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V7750 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M335 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M335 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V7750 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M335. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M335) — the FirePro 3D V7750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Radeon R5 M335
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V7750 draws 274W versus the Radeon R5 M335's 75W — a 114% difference. The Radeon R5 M335 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M335). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Radeon R5 M335
TDP	274W	75W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	234mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.0	7.3+265%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V7750 came in at $799, while the Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M335 was 81.2% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 3.7 (Radeon R5 M335) — the Radeon R5 M335 offers 428.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M335 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Radeon R5 M335
MSRP	$799	$150-81%
Performance per Dollar	0.7	3.7+429%
Codename	Tahiti	Jet
Release	January 18 2014	May 15 2016
Ranking	#423	#922

Search FirePro 3D V7750 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.