FirePro 3D V7750 vs GeForce GT 820M
FirePro 3D V7750
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 820M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V7750 is positioned at rank 371 and the GeForce GT 820M is on rank 134, so the GeForce GT 820M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 820M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V7750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 820M.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro 3D V7750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7750 and GeForce GT 820M
FirePro 3D V7750
The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.
GeForce GT 820M
The GeForce GT 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 542 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7750 scores 545 and the GeForce GT 820M reaches 542 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 820M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 1,536 (GeForce GT 820M). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 820M).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 545 | 542 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+110% | 1.659 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 576 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V7750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 820M has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 2 MB (GeForce GT 820M) — the GeForce GT 820M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 820M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.0+9% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.0+21% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs No (GeForce GT 820M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 820M).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7750 draws 274W versus the GeForce GT 820M's 100W — a 93% difference. The GeForce GT 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 350W (GeForce GT 820M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 234mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 100W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 234mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 5.4+170% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V7750 and GeForce GT 820M
