
FirePro 3D V5700
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V5700 is positioned at rank 355 and the FirePro 3D V7750 is on rank 371, so the FirePro 3D V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5700
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V7750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V5700 and FirePro 3D V7750

FirePro 3D V5700
The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.

FirePro 3D V7750
The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5700 scores 547 and the FirePro 3D V7750 reaches 545 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro 3D V7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 547 | 545 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V5700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V7750 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V7750). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V7750). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7750).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5700 draws 274W versus the FirePro 3D V7750's 274W — a 0% difference. The FirePro 3D V7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 234mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 234mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V5700 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the FirePro 3D V7750 launched at $799 and now averages $20. The FirePro 3D V7750 costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 27.3 (FirePro 3D V7750) — the FirePro 3D V7750 offers 24.7% better value.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | FirePro 3D V7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-25% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 27.3+25% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Tahiti |
| Release | January 18 2014 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #423 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















