CPU
GPU
FirePro 3D V5700
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V5700 is positioned at rank 355 and the Radeon HD 6570 is on rank 177, so the Radeon HD 6570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V5700.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $79), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 210.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+210.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($79) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V5700 and Radeon HD 6570
FirePro 3D V5700
The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.
Radeon HD 6570
The Radeon HD 6570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5700 scores 547 and the Radeon HD 6570 reaches 556 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6570 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6570). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6570).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 547 | 556+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+29% | 2.703 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V5700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6570 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6570 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6570) — the FirePro 3D V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6570). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2 (11_0)+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs None (Radeon HD 6570). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6570).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5700 draws 274W versus the Radeon HD 6570's 250W — a 9.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 250W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 170mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 2.2+10% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V5700 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon HD 6570 launched at $79 and now averages $79. The FirePro 3D V5700 costs 68.4% less ($54 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) vs 7.0 (Radeon HD 6570) — the FirePro 3D V5700 offers 212.9% better value. The FirePro 3D V5700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5700 | Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $79-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-68% | $79 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9+213% | 7.0 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Cayman |
| Release | January 18 2014 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #423 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V5700 and Radeon HD 6570
