GRID K180Q
VS
Radeon R7 M260

GRID K180Q vs Radeon R7 M260

GRID K180Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M260

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K180Q is positioned at rank 381 and the Radeon R7 M260 is on rank 486, so the GRID K180Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K180Q

#366
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
27874%
#381
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
100%
#382
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
100%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
89%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
83%
#385
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
81%
#386
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
81%
#387
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
79%
#388
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
79%
#389
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
75%
#390
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
72%
#391
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
72%
#392
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
66%
#393
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
60%
#394
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
60%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
58%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
57%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260

#476
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2267%
#478
2055%
#479
2049%
#483
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1863%
#484
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1851%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
100%
#487
100%
#488
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
100%
#489
100%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#491
99%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#493
98%
#494
98%
#495
94%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
94%
#499
Radeon R8 M535DX
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#500
Radeon R5 230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $25
93%
#501
GeForce 9300 GE
MSRP: $23|Avg: $25
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID K180Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M260 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGRID K180QRadeon R7 M260
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M260 holds the technical lead. Priced at $110 (vs $1,000), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 797.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID K180QRadeon R7 M260
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+797.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000)
More affordable ($110)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID K180Q and Radeon R7 M260

NVIDIA

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

AMD

Radeon R7 M260

The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K180Q scores 534 and the Radeon R7 M260 reaches 527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K180Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M260 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K180Q) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260).

FeatureGRID K180QRadeon R7 M260
G3D Mark Score
534+1%
527
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+317%
0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K180QRadeon R7 M260
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K180Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M260 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K180Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K180QRadeon R7 M260
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K180Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 M260's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K180Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGRID K180QRadeon R7 M260
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.4
7.0+192%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID K180Q launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the Radeon R7 M260 launched at $110 and now averages $110. The Radeon R7 M260 costs 89% less ($890 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (GRID K180Q) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon R7 M260 offers 860% better value. The Radeon R7 M260 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K180QRadeon R7 M260
MSRP
$1000
$110-89%
Avg Price (30d)
$1000
$110-89%
Performance per Dollar
0.5
4.8+860%
Codename
GK104
Opal
Release
June 28 2013
December 6 2015
Ranking
#595
#878