GRID K180Q vs Radeon R7 M260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K180Q vs Radeon R7 M260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K180Q vs Radeon R7 M260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K180Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
809.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M260

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $890 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 797.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K180Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (534 vs 527), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K180Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M260 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $890 cheaper on MSRP at $110 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 797.2% (4.8 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K180Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K180Q vs Radeon R7 M260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Radeon R7 M260

The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K180Q scores 534 and the Radeon R7 M260 reaches 527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K180Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M260 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K180Q) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260).

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R7 M260
G3D Mark Score	534+1%	527
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+300%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+317%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R7 M260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K180Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K180Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K180Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R7 M260
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K180Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 M260's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K180Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R7 M260
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	2.4	7.0+192%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K180Q came in at $1000, while the Radeon R7 M260 launched at $110. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M260 was 89% cheaper ($890 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K180Q) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon R7 M260 offers 860% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R7 M260
MSRP	$1000	$110-89%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	4.8+860%
Codename	GK104	Opal
Release	June 28 2013	December 6 2015
Ranking	#595	#878

Search GRID K180Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.