GRID K180Q vs Quadro FX 2700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K180Q vs Quadro FX 2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K180Q vs Quadro FX 2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K180Q

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
900% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌19% higher power demand at 225W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 916.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 189W instead of 225W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 2700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (543 vs 534), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K180Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 2700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $900 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 916.9% (5.4 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 2700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K180Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K180Q vs Quadro FX 2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K180Q scores 534 and the Quadro FX 2700 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K180Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 2700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K180Q) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700).

Feature	GRID K180Q	Quadro FX 2700
G3D Mark Score	534	543+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1536+540%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+268%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+60%	80
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K180Q	Quadro FX 2700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K180Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 2700 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K180Q and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K180Q) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K180Q	Quadro FX 2700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K180Q draws 225W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 17.4% difference. The Quadro FX 2700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K180Q) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K180Q	Quadro FX 2700
TDP	225W	189W-16%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	2.4	2.9+21%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K180Q came in at $1000, while the Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100. On MSRP, Quadro FX 2700 was 90% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K180Q) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 2700) — the Quadro FX 2700 offers 980% better value. The newer card here is GRID K180Q (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	GRID K180Q	Quadro FX 2700
MSRP	$1000	$100-90%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	5.4+980%
Codename	GK104	GT200B
Release	June 28 2013	November 11 2008
Ranking	#595	#815

Search GRID K180Q on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.