Quadro 600 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon Vega 3 3020e is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 600 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 3 3020e across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Vega 3 3020e

2018

Why buy it

✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Vega 3 3020e is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (535 vs 522), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Vega 3 3020e still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon Vega 3 3020e

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 535 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 600 scores 522 and the Radeon Vega 3 3020e reaches 535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 600) vs 1,280 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1283 MHz.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon Vega 3 3020e
G3D Mark Score	522	535+2%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 5.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS	3.284 TFLOPS+164%
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+26%	1283 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	144 KB	320 KB+122%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon Vega 3 3020e
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 600 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e carries 0 MB. Quadro 600 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 600 and System on the Radeon Vega 3 3020e.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon Vega 3 3020e
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 600 draws 40W versus the Radeon Vega 3 3020e's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 600) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon Vega 3 3020e
TDP	40W-60%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Perf/Watt	13.1+147%	5.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 600 came in at $179, while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 3 3020e was 100+% cheaper ($179 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Quadro 600) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 3 3020e (2018 vs 2017).

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon Vega 3 3020e
MSRP	$179	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	Infinity
Codename	GP107	Vega 12
Release	February 7 2017	November 14 2018
Ranking	#558	#435

Search Quadro 600 on Amazon

Search Radeon Vega 3 3020e on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.