Quadro 600 vs Quadro FX 5600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 600 vs Quadro FX 5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 600 vs Quadro FX 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,820 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1565.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 189W, a 149W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 5600

2008

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1575.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌372.5% higher power demand at 189W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 5600 instead at 525 vs 522, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,820 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1565.8% (2.9 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro 600 vs Quadro FX 5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Quadro FX 5600

The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 600 scores 522 and the Quadro FX 5600 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 600 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 5600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5600). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600).

Feature	Quadro 600	Quadro FX 5600
G3D Mark Score	522	525
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS+100%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 600	Quadro FX 5600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 600 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro 600) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 5600) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 600	Quadro FX 5600
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 600 draws 40W versus the Quadro FX 5600's 189W — a 130.1% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 600	Quadro FX 5600
TDP	40W-79%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	13.1+368%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 600 came in at $179, while the Quadro FX 5600 launched at $2999. On MSRP, Quadro 600 was 94% cheaper ($2820 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Quadro 600) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 5600) — the Quadro 600 offers 1350% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 600 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro 600	Quadro FX 5600
MSRP	$179-94%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	2.9+1350%	0.2
Codename	GP107	GT200B
Release	February 7 2017	November 11 2008
Ranking	#558	#815

Search Quadro 600 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 5600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.