Quadro 600 vs Radeon R5 330

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon R5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon R5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

✅47.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 40W instead of 50W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
121% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$81 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $81 MSRP).

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $98 less on MSRP ($81 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 121.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌25% higher power demand at 50W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 330 instead at 523 vs 522, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 330 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $98 cheaper on MSRP at $81 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 121.4% (6.5 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 600 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon R5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 600 scores 522 and the Radeon R5 330 reaches 523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 600) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon R5 330
G3D Mark Score	522	523
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS+58%	0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+58%	1024 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB+50%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon R5 330
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 600 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 330 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 600 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro 600) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 330) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon R5 330
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 600 draws 40W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 600) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon R5 330
TDP	40W-20%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	13.1+25%	10.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 600 came in at $179, while the Radeon R5 330 launched at $81. On MSRP, Radeon R5 330 was 54.7% cheaper ($98 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Quadro 600) vs 6.5 (Radeon R5 330) — the Radeon R5 330 offers 124.1% better value.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon R5 330
MSRP	$179	$81-55%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	6.5+124%
Codename	GP107	Weston
Release	February 7 2017	April 18 2017
Ranking	#558	#873

Search Quadro 600 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.