GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro 600

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 630M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro 600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 630M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

  • 56.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (522 vs 521), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 630M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 630M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 630M

The GeForce GT 630M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 521 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 630M scores 521 and the Quadro 600 reaches 522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 630M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 600 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 630M) vs 384 (Quadro 600). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 630MQuadro 600
G3D Mark Score
521
522
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
1.244 TFLOPS+71%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1620 MHz+71%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
144 KB+350%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 630M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 630MQuadro 600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 630M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 600 carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 630M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 630M and 64-bit on the Quadro 600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 630M) vs 1 MB (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 630MQuadro 600
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 630M draws 45W versus the Quadro 600's 40W — a 11.8% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 630M) vs 350W (Quadro 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 630MQuadro 600
TDP
45W
40W-11%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
11.6
13.1+13%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 600 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 630MQuadro 600
MSRP
$179
Codename
GK107
GP107
Release
March 22 2012
February 7 2017
Ranking
#828
#558

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.