
GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro FX 5600

GeForce GT 630M
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 630M is positioned at rank 147 and the Quadro FX 5600 is on rank 407, so the GeForce GT 630M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 630M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 630M.
| Insight | GeForce GT 630M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 630M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 630M holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 41.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 630M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 630M and Quadro FX 5600

GeForce GT 630M
The GeForce GT 630M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 521 points.

Quadro FX 5600
The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 630M scores 521 and the Quadro FX 5600 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 630M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 5600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 630M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5600). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 521 | 525 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS+17% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 630M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 630M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5600 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 5600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 630M draws 45W versus the Quadro FX 5600's 189W — a 123.1% difference. The GeForce GT 630M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 630M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-76% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6+314% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 630M costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (GeForce GT 630M) vs 10.5 (Quadro FX 5600) — the GeForce GT 630M offers 41.9% better value. The GeForce GT 630M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-30% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9+42% | 10.5 |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | March 22 2012 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #828 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















