
GeForce 9800M GS vs GeForce GT 630M

GeForce 9800M GS
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 630M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GS is positioned at rank 608 and the GeForce GT 630M is on rank 147, so the GeForce GT 630M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 630M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 630M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 630M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 630M holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 44% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+44%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GS and GeForce GT 630M

GeForce 9800M GS
The GeForce 9800M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points.

GeForce GT 630M
The GeForce GT 630M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 521 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GS scores 517 and the GeForce GT 630M reaches 521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 630M uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 384 (GeForce GT 630M).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 517 | 521 |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 384+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9800M GS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 630M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 630M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 630M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.0+21% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 630M).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 630M's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GT 630M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 350W (GeForce GT 630M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 45W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4 | 11.6+241% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 630M costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 14.9 (GeForce GT 630M) — the GeForce GT 630M offers 44.7% better value. The GeForce GT 630M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $35-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 14.9+45% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GK107 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #825 | #828 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















