GeForce 9800M GS
VS
Quadro 600

GeForce 9800M GS vs Quadro 600

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GS is positioned at rank 608 and the Quadro 600 is on rank 249, so the Quadro 600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GS

#598
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4192%
#600
3800%
#601
3790%
#605
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3446%
#606
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3423%
#608
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#609
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#610
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
99%
#611
98%
#612
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
98%
#614
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#615
GeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP: $129|Avg: $25
97%
#616
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
96%
#617
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
96%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
95%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
94%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
93%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
92%
#623
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 600

#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
99%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
97%
#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
91%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
89%
#234
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5059%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
100%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
98%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
97%
#254
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
93%
#255
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
93%
#256
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
93%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
91%
#258
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
91%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
91%
#261
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
90%
#262
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
90%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro 600 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Quadro 600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GS.

InsightGeForce 9800M GSQuadro 600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 152.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9800M GSQuadro 600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+152.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GS and Quadro 600

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GS

The GeForce 9800M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800M GS scores 517 and the Quadro 600 reaches 522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GS is built on G9x while the Quadro 600 uses Pascal, both on 65 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 384 (Quadro 600).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GSQuadro 600
G3D Mark Score
517
522
Architecture
G9x
Pascal
Process Node
65 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
224
384+71%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9800M GSQuadro 600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800M GS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 600 has 1 GB. The Quadro 600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GSQuadro 600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800M GS draws 150W versus the Quadro 600's 40W — a 115.8% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 350W (Quadro 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GSQuadro 600
TDP
150W
40W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
3.4
13.1+285%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9800M GS launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro 600 launched at $179 and now averages $20. The Quadro 600 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 26.1 (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 offers 153.4% better value. The Quadro 600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GSQuadro 600
MSRP
$200
$179-11%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$20-60%
Performance per Dollar
10.3
26.1+153%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GP107
Release
July 15 2008
February 7 2017
Ranking
#825
#558