
GeForce 9800M GS

GeForce GTS 240
GeForce 9800M GS vs GeForce GTS 240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9800M GS vs GeForce GTS 240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9800M GS vs GeForce GTS 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9800M GS
2008Why buy it
- ✅43.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌41.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 106W.
GeForce GTS 240
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 106W instead of 150W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800M GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9800M GS vs GeForce GTS 240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800M GS
The GeForce 9800M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points.

GeForce GTS 240
The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GS scores 517 and the GeForce GTS 240 reaches 515 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GS is built on G9x while the GeForce GTS 240 uses Fermi, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 517 | 515 |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224+17% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9800M GS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 240 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTS 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800M GS and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 3.3+3% | 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GS draws 150W versus the GeForce GTS 240's 106W — a 34.4% difference. The GeForce GTS 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 240). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 106W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4 | 4.9+44% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9800M GS came in at $200, while the GeForce GTS 240 launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 240 was 60% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 6.4 (GeForce GTS 240) — the GeForce GTS 240 offers 146.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTS 240 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $80-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 6.4+146% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GF106 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #825 | #791 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














