GeForce 9800M GS vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual
GeForce 9800M GS
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GS is positioned at rank 608 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual is on rank 558, so the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GS
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GS | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GS | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GS and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual
GeForce 9800M GS
The GeForce 9800M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points.
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 519 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GS scores 517 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual reaches 519 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 768 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 517 | 519 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 768+243% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GS draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4 | 10.4+206% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9800M GS launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (GeForce 9800M GS) vs 17.3 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual) — the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual offers 68% better value. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GS | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $150-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 17.3+68% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | — |
| Release | July 15 2008 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #825 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9800M GS and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual
