GeForce GTS 250M vs Quadro 600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 250M vs Quadro 600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 250M vs Quadro 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 250M

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌165% higher power demand at 106W vs 40W.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

✅30.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 106W, a 66W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (522 vs 520), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 250M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 250M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 250M vs Quadro 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 250M

The GeForce GTS 250M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points. Launch price was $129.

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 250M scores 520 and the Quadro 600 reaches 522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250M is built on Fermi while the Quadro 600 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 384 (Quadro 600). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600).

Feature	GeForce GTS 250M	Quadro 600
G3D Mark Score	520	522
Architecture	Fermi	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	1.244 TFLOPS+107%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB+78%	144 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 250M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250M	Quadro 600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250M and 64-bit on the Quadro 600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 1 MB (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250M	Quadro 600
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 250M draws 106W versus the Quadro 600's 40W — a 90.4% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 350W (Quadro 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250M	Quadro 600
TDP	106W	40W-62%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.9	13.1+167%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 600 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTS 250M	Quadro 600
MSRP	—	$179
Codename	GF106	GP107
Release	September 13 2010	February 7 2017
Ranking	#791	#558

Search GeForce GTS 250M on Amazon

Search Quadro 600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.