GeForce GTS 250M vs GRID K180Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 250M vs GRID K180Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTS 250M vs GRID K180Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 250M
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 106W instead of 225W, a 119W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
GRID K180Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌112.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 106W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 250M vs GRID K180Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTS 250M
The GeForce GTS 250M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points. Launch price was $129.
GRID K180Q
The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 250M scores 520 and the GRID K180Q reaches 534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250M is built on Fermi while the GRID K180Q uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 1,536 (GRID K180Q). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 520 | 534+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1536+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+281% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 250M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K180Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K180Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250M and 64-bit on the GRID K180Q. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 512 KB (GRID K180Q) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250M draws 106W versus the GRID K180Q's 225W — a 71.9% difference. The GeForce GTS 250M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 350W (GRID K180Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-53% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+104% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GRID K180Q (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1000 |
| Codename | GF106 | GK104 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #791 | #595 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 250M and GRID K180Q
