GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce GTS 250M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 240

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250M

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce GTS 250M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce GTS 250M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce GTS 250M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 240

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTS 250M

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTS 250M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (520 vs 515), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTS 250M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce GTS 250M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 240

The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250M

The GeForce GTS 250M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points. Launch price was $129.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 240 scores 515 and the GeForce GTS 250M reaches 520 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 240 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTS 250M uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 250M). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250M).

FeatureGeForce GTS 240GeForce GTS 250M
G3D Mark Score
515
520
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTS 240GeForce GTS 250M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250M.

FeatureGeForce GTS 240GeForce GTS 250M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 250M). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTS 240GeForce GTS 250M
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.1 (10_1)
OpenGL
3.2+52%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 240) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 250M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 250M).

FeatureGeForce GTS 240GeForce GTS 250M
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 240 draws 106W versus the GeForce GTS 250M's 106W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTS 250M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 240) vs 300W (GeForce GTS 250M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTS 240GeForce GTS 250M
TDP
106W
106W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
4.9
4.9