GeForce GTS 240 vs Radeon R5 330
GeForce GTS 240
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 240 is positioned at rank 192 and the Radeon R5 330 is on rank 435, so the GeForce GTS 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 240
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 330 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon R5 330 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 240 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 240.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTS 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $45), it costs 11% less, resulting in a 10.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 240 and Radeon R5 330
GeForce GTS 240
The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.
Radeon R5 330
The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 240 scores 515 and the Radeon R5 330 reaches 523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 240 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 515 | 523+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 240 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 has 2 GB. The Radeon R5 330 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 240) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 330) — the GeForce GTS 240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 330). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (FL 11_1)+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 330).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 240 draws 106W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 71.8% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 240) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 50W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 10.5+114% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 240 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R5 330 launched at $81 and now averages $45. The GeForce GTS 240 costs 11.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.9 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 11.6 (Radeon R5 330) — the GeForce GTS 240 offers 11.2% better value. The Radeon R5 330 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-1% | $81 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-11% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9+11% | 11.6 |
| Codename | GF106 | Weston |
| Release | September 13 2010 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #791 | #873 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 240 and Radeon R5 330
