GeForce GTS 240 vs Quadro FX 5600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 240 vs Quadro FX 5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 240 vs Quadro FX 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 240

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,919 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3577.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 106W instead of 189W, a 83W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 5600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 5600

2008

Why buy it

✅29.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3648.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌78.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 106W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 5600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (525 vs 515), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTS 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,919 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3577.3% (6.4 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 5600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 240 vs Quadro FX 5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 240

The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.

Quadro FX 5600

The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 240 scores 515 and the Quadro FX 5600 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 240 is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 5600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5600). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600).

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Quadro FX 5600
G3D Mark Score	515	525+2%
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	240+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 240 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 5600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Quadro FX 5600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 240 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5600.

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Quadro FX 5600
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 240 draws 106W versus the Quadro FX 5600's 189W — a 56.3% difference. The GeForce GTS 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 240) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Quadro FX 5600
TDP	106W-44%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+75%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 240 came in at $80, while the Quadro FX 5600 launched at $2999. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 240 was 97.3% cheaper ($2919 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.4 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 5600) — the GeForce GTS 240 offers 3100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTS 240 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Quadro FX 5600
MSRP	$80-97%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	6.4+3100%	0.2
Codename	GF106	GT200B
Release	September 13 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#791	#815

Search GeForce GTS 240 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 5600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.