GeForce GTS 240 vs Radeon HD 8670M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 240 vs Radeon HD 8670M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 240 vs Radeon HD 8670M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 240

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8670M

2013

Why buy it

✅48.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (520 vs 515), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTS 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 8670M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 240 vs Radeon HD 8670M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 240

The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon HD 8670M

The Radeon HD 8670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 240 scores 515 and the Radeon HD 8670M reaches 520 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 240 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 8670M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670M). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670M).

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Radeon HD 8670M
G3D Mark Score	515	520
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	1280+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	2.304 TFLOPS+283%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L1 Cache	256 KB	320 KB+25%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 240 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8670M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Radeon HD 8670M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240 and System on the Radeon HD 8670M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 240) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8670M) — the Radeon HD 8670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Radeon HD 8670M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 240 draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 8670M's 100W — a 5.8% difference. The Radeon HD 8670M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 240) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Radeon HD 8670M
TDP	106W	100W-6%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.9	5.2+6%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8670M (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTS 240	Radeon HD 8670M
MSRP	$80	—
Codename	GF106	Neptune
Release	September 13 2010	May 14 2013
Ranking	#791	#507

Search GeForce GTS 240 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8670M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.