CPU
GPU
GeForce GTS 240
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8670D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 240 is positioned at rank 192 and the Radeon HD 8670D is on rank 146, so the Radeon HD 8670D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 240
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8670D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8670D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 167.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+167.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 240 and Radeon HD 8670D
GeForce GTS 240
The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.
Radeon HD 8670D
The Radeon HD 8670D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 240 scores 515 and the Radeon HD 8670D reaches 517 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 240 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 8670D uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670D). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670D).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 515 | 517 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1280+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+326% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 240 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 240 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 240) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8670D) — the Radeon HD 8670D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 8670D). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 240) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8670D). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 240 draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 8670D's 200W — a 61.4% difference. The GeForce GTS 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 240) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-47% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+88% | 2.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 240 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 8670D launched at $60 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 8670D costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.9 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 34.5 (Radeon HD 8670D) — the Radeon HD 8670D offers 167.4% better value. The Radeon HD 8670D is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $60-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 34.5+167% |
| Codename | GF106 | Pitcairn |
| Release | September 13 2010 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #791 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 240 and Radeon HD 8670D
