GeForce GTS 250M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5570

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250M

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5570

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 250M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5570 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 250M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 250M

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 112% higher power demand at 106W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 5570

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 106W, a 56W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (525 vs 520), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 250M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 5570 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 250M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 250M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250M

The GeForce GTS 250M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points. Launch price was $129.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5570

The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 250M scores 520 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250M is built on Fermi while the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5570).

FeatureGeForce GTS 250MMobility Radeon HD 5570
G3D Mark Score
520
525
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+86%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
256 KB+220%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 250M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250MMobility Radeon HD 5570
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 250M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 5570.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250MMobility Radeon HD 5570
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 11.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250MMobility Radeon HD 5570
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
11.0
OpenGL
2.1
4.4+110%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs UVD 2.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 250M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570).

FeatureGeForce GTS 250MMobility Radeon HD 5570
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 2.3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 2.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 250M draws 106W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5570's 50W — a 71.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250MMobility Radeon HD 5570
TDP
106W
50W-53%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
4.9
10.5+114%