
GeForce GTS 250M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5570

GeForce GTS 250M
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 250M is positioned at rank 84 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is on rank 431, so the GeForce GTS 250M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 250M
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 250M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 250M | Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 250M and Mobility Radeon HD 5570

GeForce GTS 250M
The GeForce GTS 250M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points. Launch price was $129.

Mobility Radeon HD 5570
The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 250M scores 520 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250M is built on Fermi while the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5570).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 520 | 525 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+86% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+220% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 250M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 11.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4+110% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs UVD 2.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 250M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 5570).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250M draws 106W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5570's 50W — a 71.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5570). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 50W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 10.5+114% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















