Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon HD 8670M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon HD 8670M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon HD 8670M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 5600

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌89% higher power demand at 189W vs 100W.

Radeon HD 8670M

2013

Why buy it

✅14.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 100W instead of 189W, a 89W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 5600 instead at 525 vs 520, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 5600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 5600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 8670M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon HD 8670M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 5600

The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8670M

The Radeon HD 8670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 5600 scores 525 and the Radeon HD 8670M reaches 520 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8670M uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5600) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670M).

Feature	Quadro FX 5600	Radeon HD 8670M
G3D Mark Score	525	520
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.304 TFLOPS+270%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 5600	Radeon HD 8670M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 5600 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670M carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 5600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5600 and System on the Radeon HD 8670M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 5600) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8670M) — the Radeon HD 8670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 5600	Radeon HD 8670M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 5600 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8670M's 100W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon HD 8670M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 5600	Radeon HD 8670M
TDP	189W	100W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	2.8	5.2+86%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8670M (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 5600	Radeon HD 8670M
MSRP	$2999	—
Codename	GT200B	Neptune
Release	November 11 2008	May 14 2013
Ranking	#815	#507

Search Quadro FX 5600 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8670M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.