Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon R5 330

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5600

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 330

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon R5 330 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon R5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon R5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 5600

2008

Why buy it

  • 47.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3602.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,999 MSRPvs$81 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $81 MSRP).
  • 278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,918 less on MSRP ($81 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3588.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 5600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 5600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (525 vs 523), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 5600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 330 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,918 cheaper on MSRP at $81 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3588.4% (6.5 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 5600 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 5600 vs Radeon R5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5600

The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 5600 scores 525 and the Radeon R5 330 reaches 523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5600) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330).

FeatureQuadro FX 5600Radeon R5 330
G3D Mark Score
525
523
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+26%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 5600Radeon R5 330
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 5600 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 carries 2 GB. Quadro FX 5600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5600 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 5600) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 330) — the Quadro FX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 5600Radeon R5 330
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 5600 draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5600) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 5600Radeon R5 330
TDP
189W
50W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
2.8
10.5+275%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 5600 came in at $2999, while the Radeon R5 330 launched at $81. On MSRP, Radeon R5 330 was 97.3% cheaper ($2918 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 5600) vs 6.5 (Radeon R5 330) — the Radeon R5 330 offers 3150% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 330 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 5600Radeon R5 330
MSRP
$2999
$81-97%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
6.5+3150%
Codename
GT200B
Weston
Release
November 11 2008
April 18 2017
Ranking
#815
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.