GeForce GT 635M vs Quadro FX 5600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 635M vs Quadro FX 5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 635M vs Quadro FX 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 635M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 189W, a 144W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 5600 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Quadro FX 5600

2008

Why buy it

✅52.9% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌320% higher power demand at 189W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 5600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.9% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 635M instead at 540 vs 525, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 635M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 5600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 5600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 635M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 635M vs Quadro FX 5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 635M

The GeForce GT 635M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.

Quadro FX 5600

The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 635M scores 540 and the Quadro FX 5600 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 5600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 635M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5600). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600).

Feature	GeForce GT 635M	Quadro FX 5600
G3D Mark Score	540+3%	525
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS+17%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 635M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 5600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 635M	Quadro FX 5600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 635M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5600 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5600.

Feature	GeForce GT 635M	Quadro FX 5600
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB	4 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 635M draws 45W versus the Quadro FX 5600's 189W — a 123.1% difference. The GeForce GT 635M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 635M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 635M	Quadro FX 5600
TDP	45W-76%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	12.0+329%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 635M (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 635M	Quadro FX 5600
MSRP	—	$2999
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	March 22 2012	November 11 2008
Ranking	#828	#815

Search GeForce GT 635M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 5600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.