
GeForce GT 635M
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 3 3020e
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 635M is positioned at rank #138 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 635M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Vega 3 3020e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 635M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 635M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 3 3020e.
| Insight | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 635M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 635M and Radeon Vega 3 3020e

GeForce GT 635M
The GeForce GT 635M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.

Radeon Vega 3 3020e
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 535 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 635M scores 540 and the Radeon Vega 3 3020e reaches 535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 635M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635M) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 540 | 535 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 3.284 TFLOPS+350% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1283 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 320 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 635M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 635M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 635M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 635M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) (GeForce GT 635M) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 635M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 635M draws 45W versus the Radeon Vega 3 3020e's 100W — a 75.9% difference. The GeForce GT 635M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 635M) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-55% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0+126% | 5.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Vega 12 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #828 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












