GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 635M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M255

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 635M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M255 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R5 M255

2014

Why buy it

  • 23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 M255 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (543 vs 540), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 635M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M255 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M255 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 635M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 635M

The GeForce GT 635M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M255

The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 635M scores 540 and the Radeon R5 M255 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M255 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 635M) vs 640 (Radeon R5 M255). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 635MRadeon R5 M255
G3D Mark Score
540
543
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+62%
Boost Clock
950 MHz+3%
925 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
160 KB+400%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 635M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M255 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 635MRadeon R5 M255
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 635M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M255 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M255 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M255.

FeatureGeForce GT 635MRadeon R5 M255
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
4 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 635M) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M255). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 635MRadeon R5 M255
DirectX
11.0
12+9%
OpenGL
4.1
4.3+5%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) (GeForce GT 635M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R5 M255). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 635M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R5 M255).

FeatureGeForce GT 635MRadeon R5 M255
Encoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 635M draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 M255's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 635M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 635M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M255). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 635MRadeon R5 M255
TDP
45W-40%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
12.0+67%
7.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M255 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 635MRadeon R5 M255
MSRP
$150
Codename
GK107
Venus
Release
March 22 2012
January 28 2014
Ranking
#828
#851

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.