
GeForce GT 635M

Radeon R5 M255
GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 635M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M255 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Radeon R5 M255
2014Why buy it
- ✅23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 635M vs Radeon R5 M255 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 635M
The GeForce GT 635M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.

Radeon R5 M255
The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 635M scores 540 and the Radeon R5 M255 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M255 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 635M) vs 640 (Radeon R5 M255). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 540 | 543 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+62% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz+3% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 635M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M255 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 635M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M255 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M255 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M255.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 4 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 635M) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M255). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.3+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) (GeForce GT 635M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R5 M255). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 635M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R5 M255).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 635M draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 M255's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 635M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 635M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M255). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0+67% | 7.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R5 M255 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635M | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | GK107 | Venus |
| Release | March 22 2012 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #828 | #851 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














