
Radeon HD 8670M

Radeon R7 M260
Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R7 M260 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R7 M260 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R7 M260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 8670M
2013Why buy it
- ✅71.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon R7 M260
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8670M vs Radeon R7 M260 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8670M
The Radeon HD 8670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points.

Radeon R7 M260
The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8670M scores 520 and the Radeon R7 M260 reaches 527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8670M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M260 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 715 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 520 | 527+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS+320% | 0.5491 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz+26% | 715 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+233% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8670M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 8670M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon HD 8670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8670M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 M260's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R7 M260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.2 | 7.0+35% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260 (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $110 |
| Codename | Neptune | Opal |
| Release | May 14 2013 | December 6 2015 |
| Ranking | #507 | #878 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














