GRID K180Q vs Radeon R5 330

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K180Q vs Radeon R5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K180Q vs Radeon R5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K180Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1134.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$81 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $81 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $919 less on MSRP ($81 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1109.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K180Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (534 vs 523), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K180Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 330 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $919 cheaper on MSRP at $81 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1109.1% (6.5 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K180Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K180Q vs Radeon R5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K180Q scores 534 and the Radeon R5 330 reaches 523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K180Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K180Q) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330).

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R5 330
G3D Mark Score	534+2%	523
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+300%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+191%	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R5 330
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K180Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 330 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K180Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K180Q) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 330) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R5 330
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K180Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K180Q) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R5 330
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	2.4	10.5+338%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K180Q came in at $1000, while the Radeon R5 330 launched at $81. On MSRP, Radeon R5 330 was 91.9% cheaper ($919 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K180Q) vs 6.5 (Radeon R5 330) — the Radeon R5 330 offers 1200% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 330 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K180Q	Radeon R5 330
MSRP	$1000	$81-92%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	6.5+1200%
Codename	GK104	Weston
Release	June 28 2013	April 18 2017
Ranking	#595	#873

Search GRID K180Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.