Radeon R5 A6-7480 vs Quadro K610M
Radeon R5 A6-7480
Popular choices:
Quadro K610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is positioned at rank 86 and the Quadro K610M is on rank 170, so the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 A6-7480
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 A6-7480.
| Insight | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 A6-7480 and Quadro K610M
Radeon R5 A6-7480
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.
Quadro K610M
The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 scores 697 and the Quadro K610M reaches 714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro K610M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 384 (Quadro K610M). Raw compute: 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 697 | 714+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.834 TFLOPS+576% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1266 MHz+13% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 144+800% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+350% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K610M has 1 GB. The Quadro K610M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 1 MB (Quadro K610M) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 draws 150W versus the Quadro K610M's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 350W (Quadro K610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6 | 23.8+417% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GM108 |
| Release | June 29 2016 | March 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #305 | #842 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 A6-7480 and Quadro K610M
