
Radeon R5 A6-8500P vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R5 A6-8500P
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is positioned at rank #203 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 A6-8500P
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1240.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 A6-8500P.
| Insight | Radeon R5 A6-8500P | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1240.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1240.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 793.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon R5 A6-8500P.
| Insight | Radeon R5 A6-8500P | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+793.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 A6-8500P and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R5 A6-8500P
The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 587 points. Launch price was $579.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R5 A6-8500P scores 587 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1240.5%. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-8500P | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 587 | 7,869+1241% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+329% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS+442% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2105 MHz+26% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-8500P | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 A6-8500P comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon R5 A6-8500P has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-8500P | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 A6-8500P draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-8500P | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.3 | 104.9+4461% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 A6-8500P launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.7 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 796.6% better value. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-8500P | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-33% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.7 | 104.9+797% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | TU117 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #65 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















