CPU
GPU
Radeon R5 M240
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R5 M240 is positioned at rank #238 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M240
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M240 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2883.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M240.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2883.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2883.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 646% better value per dollar than the Radeon R5 M240.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+646%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M240 and GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R5 M240 scores 473 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 2883.9%. The Radeon R5 M240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M240) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 473 | 14,114+2884% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 1920+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.448 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+1340% |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 1680 MHz+115% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 20 | 120+500% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 1.9 MB+2275% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M240 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 M240) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R5 M240) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (Turing).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M240 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M240) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-81% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.8 | 88.2+458% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The Radeon R5 M240 costs 75% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.8 (Radeon R5 M240) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 644.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M240 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-71% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-75% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | 117.6+644% |
| Codename | Oland | TU106 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #911 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M240 and GeForce RTX 2060
