Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon R5 M320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon R5 M320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon R5 M320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 M240

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M320

2015

Why buy it

✅68.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 68.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (475 vs 473), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 M240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 49.4% (4.7 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M320 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon R5 M320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

Radeon R5 M320

The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 M240 scores 473 and the Radeon R5 M320 reaches 475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M320 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M240) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320).

Feature	Radeon R5 M240	Radeon R5 M320
G3D Mark Score	473	475
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	1024+220%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 M240	Radeon R5 M320
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M320.

Feature	Radeon R5 M240	Radeon R5 M320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 M240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M320's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M240) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M320). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R5 M240	Radeon R5 M320
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	15.8+151%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 M240 came in at $100, while the Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M240 was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.7 (Radeon R5 M240) vs 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) — the Radeon R5 M240 offers 46.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M320 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R5 M240	Radeon R5 M320
MSRP	$100-33%	$150
Performance per Dollar	4.7+47%	3.2
Codename	Oland	Pitcairn
Release	October 8 2013	June 9 2015
Ranking	#911	#522

Search Radeon R5 M240 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.