Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M240

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V3800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M240 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V3800
0.5 GB 74
472
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 8490
brand logoRadeon HD 8370D
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 3850
brand logoRadeon HD 8570D
brand logoRadeon R9 M295X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon R5 M240
0.5 GB 30
473
+0.2%
brand logoRadeon HD 8490
brand logoRadeon HD 8370D
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 3850
brand logoRadeon HD 8570D
brand logoRadeon R9 M295X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V3800

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    29% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌146.7% higher power demand at 74W vs 30W.
  • ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R5 M240

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 29.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 74W, a 44W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 M240 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (473 vs 472), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 29.3% (4.7 vs 3.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V3800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V3800

The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V3800 scores 472 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800Radeon R5 M240
G3D Mark Score
472
473
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+150%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS+146%
0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+100%
20
L1 Cache
80 KB
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800Radeon R5 M240
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800Radeon R5 M240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800Radeon R5 M240
DirectX
11.2
12+7%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800Radeon R5 M240
Encoder
UVD 2.3
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 84.6% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800Radeon R5 M240
TDP
74W
30W-59%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
168mm
1mm
Height
64mm
—
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C
—
Perf/Watt
6.4
15.8+147%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V3800 came in at $129, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M240 was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.7 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 4.7 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon R5 M240 offers 27% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800Radeon R5 M240
MSRP
$129
$100-22%
Performance per Dollar
3.7
4.7+27%
Codename
Juniper
Oland
Release
April 26 2010
October 8 2013
Ranking
#780
#911
Search FirePro 3D V3800 on AmazonSearch Radeon R5 M240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.