
FirePro 3D V3800

GeForce GT 540M
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce GT 540M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce GT 540M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce GT 540M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V3800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌48% higher power demand at 74W vs 50W.
GeForce GT 540M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 74W, a 24W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce GT 540M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V3800
The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.

GeForce GT 540M
The GeForce GT 540M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 474 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3800 scores 472 and the GeForce GT 540M reaches 474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 540M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 384 (GeForce GT 540M). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 540M).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 472 | 474 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+49% | 0.7427 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB+150% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 540M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V3800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3800 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 540M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 540M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3800 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 540M.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 540M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+2% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.4+10% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs No (GeForce GT 540M). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 540M).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3800 draws 74W versus the GeForce GT 540M's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The GeForce GT 540M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 350W (GeForce GT 540M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 50W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 64mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4 | 9.5+48% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 540M (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | — |
| Codename | Juniper | GK107 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #780 | #792 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














