Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 9600 GT

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V3800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9600 GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 9600 GT Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V3800
0.5 GB 74
472
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 8490
brand logoRadeon HD 8370D
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 3850
brand logoRadeon HD 8570D
brand logoRadeon R9 M295X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce 9600 GT
1 GB 150
473
+0.2%
brand logoGeForce Go 7950 GTX
brand logoGeForce 9700M GTS
brand logoGeForce GT 335M
brand logoGeForce 810M
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 9600 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V3800

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 15.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.7 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 74W instead of 150W, a 76W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 9600 GT

2008

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    15.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ❌102.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 74W.
  • ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9600 GT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (473 vs 472), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 65nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V3800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.3% (3.7 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce 9600 GT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 9600 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V3800

The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600 GT

The GeForce 9600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V3800 scores 472 and the GeForce 9600 GT reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 9600 GT uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 224 (GeForce 9600 GT).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800GeForce 9600 GT
G3D Mark Score
472
473
Architecture
TeraScale 2
G9x
Process Node
40 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
800+257%
224
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9600 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V3800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800GeForce 9600 GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V3800 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9600 GT carries 1 GB. GeForce 9600 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3800 and 64-bit on the GeForce 9600 GT.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800GeForce 9600 GT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9600 GT). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800GeForce 9600 GT
DirectX
11.2
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.4+33%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs PureVideo HD (GeForce 9600 GT). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9600 GT).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800GeForce 9600 GT
Encoder
UVD 2.3
PureVideo HD
Decoder
UVD 2.3
PureVideo HD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3800 draws 74W versus the GeForce 9600 GT's 150W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 350W (GeForce 9600 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800GeForce 9600 GT
TDP
74W-51%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
168mm
229mm
Height
64mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80
Perf/Watt
6.4+100%
3.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V3800 came in at $129, while the GeForce 9600 GT launched at $149. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V3800 was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.7 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 3.2 (GeForce 9600 GT) — the FirePro 3D V3800 offers 15.6% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V3800 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3800GeForce 9600 GT
MSRP
$129-13%
$149
Performance per Dollar
3.7+16%
3.2
Codename
Juniper
NB9E-GTX
Release
April 26 2010
July 15 2008
Ranking
#780
#825
Search FirePro 3D V3800 on AmazonSearch GeForce 9600 GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.