FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V3800

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.7 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M320

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.3% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (475 vs 472), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro 3D V3800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.5% (3.7 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M320 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon R5 M320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V3800

The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon R5 M320

The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V3800 scores 472 and the Radeon R5 M320 reaches 475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 M320 uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320).

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon R5 M320
G3D Mark Score	472	475
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800	1024+28%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon R5 M320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M320.

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon R5 M320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R5 M320's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro 3D V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon R5 M320
TDP	74W-1%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	168mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.4+2%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V3800 came in at $129, while the Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V3800 was 14% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.7 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) — the FirePro 3D V3800 offers 15.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M320 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon R5 M320
MSRP	$129-14%	$150
Performance per Dollar	3.7+16%	3.2
Codename	Juniper	Pitcairn
Release	April 26 2010	June 9 2015
Ranking	#780	#522

Search FirePro 3D V3800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.