FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon HD 7670M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon HD 7670M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon HD 7670M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V3800

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 74W instead of 100W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7670M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌35.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 74W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7670M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (476 vs 472), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro 3D V3800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 7670M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V3800 vs Radeon HD 7670M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V3800

The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon HD 7670M

The Radeon HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V3800 scores 472 and the Radeon HD 7670M reaches 476 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7670M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7670M). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670M).

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon HD 7670M
G3D Mark Score	472	476
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800	1280+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS	2.176 TFLOPS+97%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L1 Cache	80 KB	320 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon HD 7670M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V3800 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7670M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3800 and System on the Radeon HD 7670M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 7670M) — the Radeon HD 7670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon HD 7670M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3800 draws 74W versus the Radeon HD 7670M's 100W — a 29.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon HD 7670M
TDP	74W-26%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.4+33%	4.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7670M (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro 3D V3800	Radeon HD 7670M
MSRP	$129	—
Codename	Juniper	Wimbledon
Release	April 26 2010	April 24 2012
Ranking	#780	#531

Search FirePro 3D V3800 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7670M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.