
GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon R5 M240

GeForce GT 540M
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 M240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 540M is positioned at rank 172 and the Radeon R5 M240 is on rank 238, so the GeForce GT 540M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 540M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 540M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M240.
| Insight | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 540M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 540M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 540M and Radeon R5 M240

GeForce GT 540M
The GeForce GT 540M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 474 points.

Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 540M scores 474 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 540M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 540M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 474 | 473 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+20% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS+66% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz+24% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+60% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 80 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 540M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 540M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 540M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 540M draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 540M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.5 | 15.8+66% |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.8 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 15.8 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon R5 M240 offers 0% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | 15.8 |
| Codename | GK107 | Oland |
| Release | January 9 2013 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #792 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















