GeForce GT 540M
VS
Radeon R5 M240

GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon R5 M240

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 540M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M240

2013Boost: 780 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 540M is positioned at rank 172 and the Radeon R5 M240 is on rank 238, so the GeForce GT 540M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 540M

#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
99%
#161
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
344%
#163
311%
#164
311%
#168
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
282%
#169
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
281%
#172
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#176
GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#178
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
97%
#179
97%
#180
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
96%
#181
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
96%
#182
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#186
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M240

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1534%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1473%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1456%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1454%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1451%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1442%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1424%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1419%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1406%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1402%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1385%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1382%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1357%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1356%
#99
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#223
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1691%
#238
Radeon R5 M240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#239
Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
100%
#240
RADEON HD 6350
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
99%
#241
Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $25
98%
#244
Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP: $101|Avg: $15
95%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
93%
#247
GeForce G100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
93%
#249
Radeon R7 M265
MSRP: $130|Avg: $30
91%
#250
Radeon HD 8250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
#251
Radeon HD 3300
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
89%
#253
Radeon R5 220
MSRP: $35|Avg: $15
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 540M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M240.

InsightGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 540M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 540M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+0.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 540M and Radeon R5 M240

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 540M

The GeForce GT 540M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 474 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 540M scores 474 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 540M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 540M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 780 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
G3D Mark Score
474
473
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS+66%
0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
967 MHz+24%
780 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+60%
20
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 540M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 540M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
DirectX
11.0
12+9%
Max Displays
1
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 540M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 540M draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 540M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
9.5
15.8+66%
💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.8 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 15.8 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon R5 M240 offers 0% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 540MRadeon R5 M240
MSRP
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$30
Performance per Dollar
15.8
15.8
Codename
GK107
Oland
Release
January 9 2013
October 8 2013
Ranking
#792
#911