Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 910M
Radeon R5 M330
Popular choices:
GeForce 910M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M330 is positioned at rank 480 and the GeForce 910M is on rank 185, so the GeForce 910M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M330
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 910M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 910M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M330 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M330 | GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 910M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M330 and GeForce 910M
Radeon R5 M330
The Radeon R5 M330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 596 points.
GeForce 910M
The GeForce 910M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 600 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M330 scores 596 and the GeForce 910M reaches 600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M330 is built on GCN while the GeForce 910M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R5 M330) vs 384 (GeForce 910M).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 596 | 600 |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M330 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 910M has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 M330 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R5 M330) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 910M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon R5 M330) vs None (GeForce 910M). Decoder: VCE vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon R5 M330) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 910M).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | None |
| Decoder | VCE | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M330 draws 75W versus the GeForce 910M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 910M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M330) vs 350W (GeForce 910M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 33W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 75°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 7.9 | 18.2+130% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M330 and GeForce 910M
