
Radeon R5 M330 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P

Radeon R5 M330
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 A6-8500P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M330 is positioned at rank 480 and the Radeon R5 A6-8500P is on rank 203, so the Radeon R5 A6-8500P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M330
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 A6-8500P
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 A6-8500P uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M330 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 A6-8500P.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M330 | Radeon R5 A6-8500P |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 M330 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $50 for the Radeon R5 A6-8500P, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 153.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M330 | Radeon R5 A6-8500P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+153.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M330 and Radeon R5 A6-8500P

Radeon R5 M330
The Radeon R5 M330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 596 points.

Radeon R5 A6-8500P
The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 587 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M330 scores 596 and the Radeon R5 A6-8500P reaches 587 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M330 is built on GCN while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R5 M330) vs 3,840 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | Radeon R5 A6-8500P |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 596+2% | 587 |
| Architecture | GCN | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3840+275% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | Radeon R5 A6-8500P |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M330 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 M330 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | Radeon R5 A6-8500P |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M330 draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 A6-8500P's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M330) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-8500P). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | Radeon R5 A6-8500P |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.9+243% | 2.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M330 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Radeon R5 M330 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.8 (Radeon R5 M330) vs 11.7 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) — the Radeon R5 M330 offers 154.7% better value. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M330 | Radeon R5 A6-8500P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $120 | $100-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.8+155% | 11.7 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Navi 21 |
| Release | June 9 2015 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #522 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















