
Radeon R6 M255DX vs Radeon HD 7570

Radeon R6 M255DX
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R6 M255DX.
| Insight | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R6 M255DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R6 M255DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $150), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1392.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1392.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R6 M255DX and Radeon HD 7570

Radeon R6 M255DX
The Radeon R6 M255DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 605 points.

Radeon HD 7570
The Radeon HD 7570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 608 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R6 M255DX scores 605 and the Radeon HD 7570 reaches 608 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R6 M255DX is built on GCN while the Radeon HD 7570 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R6 M255DX) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7570).
| Feature | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 605 | 608 |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R6 M255DX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7570 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7570 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R6 M255DX) vs 11 (Radeon HD 7570). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0+9% | 11 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R6 M255DX draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7570's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Radeon R6 M255DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R6 M255DX) vs 250W (Radeon HD 7570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 165mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.2+742% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R6 M255DX launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 7570 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon R6 M255DX costs 93.3% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.5 (Radeon R6 M255DX) vs 4.1 (Radeon HD 7570) — the Radeon R6 M255DX offers 1375.6% better value. The Radeon R6 M255DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R6 M255DX | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-93% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.5+1376% | 4.1 |
| Codename | — | Tahiti |
| Release | June 4 2014 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #800 | #431 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















